个人中心

登录 | 注册

咨询/预约我的订单我的网课我的问答我的评价我的权益浏览记录我的收藏
机构中心

教培机构
教培机构入驻教育宝平台、搭建私域流量运营系统或购买百度知了好学

查看详情登录后台

网课机构
录播课程和知识付费机构入驻教育宝网课平台

查看详情登录后台

基础教育学校
公立私立幼儿园、中小学、职业学校入驻教育宝学校库

查看详情登录后台

课外活动机构
研学、周末活动、冬夏令营机构入驻研学活动子平台

查看详情登录后台

老师/大咖
各细分领域的资深老师、教练和从业者入驻教育宝大咖平台

查看详情申请合作
平台客服
- 400-601-2788

石家庄嘉贝教育

勠力十三载同心续华章

石家庄嘉贝教育老师直接接听

400-029-09** 转 5640

查看完整号码

扫码拨号

微信扫码拨号

雅思大作文7分范文及解析：政府是否应该优先关注医疗

作者：小朗来源：朗阁教育 2020/10/20 11:37:20

石家庄朗阁教育讲师本次给学子们分享了雅思写作范文，那么你想要了解一下吗？现在就来这里看看详情是什么吧。

Some people say governments should give priority to health care, while others believe that taxpayers’ money should be spent on other important priorities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

题目来源：2015年7月25日大陆雅思大作文

题目大意

一些人或政府应该优先关注医疗，而其他人相信纳税人的钱应该优先花在更加重要的事情上。讨论双方观点并给出自己的观点。

思路解析

1. 题干两句话，分别为对立的两个观点，比较对象为政府把纳税人的钱优先花在医疗vs其他更重要的事情上。出题方式为Discuss both views and give your own opinion.讨论类，需要对双方观点进行充分的讨论，最终给出自己的观点。

2. 话题类型：政府投资+教育。话题词：government；health care；taxpayers’ money。逻辑词汇：priority; other important

提纲

高分写作示范

The year 2020 witnesses the global contagion of coronavirus and some inappropriate strategies in the early stage of spread compounds a broader deterioration in the crisis, which has aroused people's thinking about the priority of government conducts. Some people argue that the government should give exclusive priority to issues related to health, while others believe that the government should take precedence over other crucial civil projects such as infrastructure and education.

Making health care as a priority investment can achieve both short-term and long-term returns. Especially in the case of the current epidemic, a large number of people in different countries are infected with the virus and urgently need treatments, by which I mean priority investment in health can ensure the stable supply of medical resources, and meanwhile vaccine research aiming at this virus can also be guaranteed, which is of great significance for the uninfected population too. Besides, from the government's point of view, money should be given priority to programs that will pay off in the long run, such as a plan to overhaul the nation's health care system to guarantee availability and affordability. Although with medical costs soaring, businesses may feel the weight of the recession, with this budget the government can make a historic commitment to comprehensive health care reform, which is a step that will not only make families healthier and companies more competitive but over the long term, it will also help the government bring down the deficit.

On the other hand, governments' investment should not be confined within the boundary of health care, and there do exist other projects that are of priority concern. For example, in 2020, China is carrying out comprehensive poverty alleviation work. Specifically, the government is giving priority to the financial and policy support to underprivileged families in deprived areas to help solve the bread-and-butter matters so as to enhance Chinese overall productivity and greatly narrow the gap between the rich and the poor. Besides, education, which also concerns the long-term development of the whole nation, should receive more funds as well. More talented students will be cultivated due to the abundance of governments' financial support, offering more intellectual support to the development of society. The above projects should be taken as the key consideration direction of the government in the investment process.

To summarize, it seems to me that just as a family has to make hard choices about where to spend and where to save, so do governments, and which project is more priority should depend on the specific national conditions at that time, as long as the government investment can ultimately improve the well-being and stability of taxpayers themselves.